Research Article
Differences and Similarities in Scientists’ Images Among Popular USA Middle Grades Science Textbooks

Rebecca Hite

273 321

Hite. Differences and similarities in scientists’ images among popular USA middle grades science textbooks. . 2021;2(2):63-83. doi: 10.12973/ejmse.2.2.63
Hite, R. (2021). Differences and similarities in scientists’ images among popular USA middle grades science textbooks. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 2(2), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.2.2.63
Hite Rebecca. "Differences and Similarities in Scientists’ Images Among Popular USA Middle Grades Science Textbooks ," European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education 2, no. 2 (2021): 63-83. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.2.2.63
Hite, 2021, 'Differences and similarities in scientists’ images among popular USA middle grades science textbooks', European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63-83. Hite, Rebecca. "Differences and Similarities in Scientists’ Images Among Popular USA Middle Grades Science Textbooks." European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, vol. 2, no. 2, 2021, pp. 63-83, https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.2.2.63.

Abstract

Research on students’ perceptions of scientists is ongoing, starting with early research by Mead and Metraux in the 1950s and continuing in the present. Continued research interest in this area is likely due to scholarship suggesting adolescents’ impressions of scientists are sourced in-part from media, which influence their interests in science and identity in becoming a scientist. A significant source of images, in which adolescents (or middle school students) view science and scientists, is in their science textbooks. A qualitative content analysis explored images of scientists in three of the major U.S.-based middle grade science textbooks published in the new millennium: sixth grade biology, seventh grade earth science, and eighth grade physical science. The Draw A Scientist Test (DAST) Checklist was employed to assess scientists’ images and the stereotypes therein. From nine textbooks, 435 images of scientists were coded and analyzed by publisher and grade level / area by DAST constructs of appearance, location, careers, and scientific activities. Statistical analyses showed significant variances between grade levels and textbook publishers of scientists. Despite scientists portrayed in active endeavors, traditional tropes of the scowling, older, solitary, white male scientist persist. This study offers insight in leveraging improved images of scientists in textbooks.

Keywords: Draw-a-scientist-test, middle school, students’ perceptions, scientists’ images, textbooks.


References

Alexander, P. A., & Singer, L. M. (2017, October 15). A new study shows that students learn way more effectively from print textbooks than screens. Business Insider. https://cutt.ly/OTWbU6Z  

Almeda, M., & Baker, R. S. (2020). Predicting student participation in STEM careers: The role of affect and engagement during middle school. (EJ1267599). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1267599

American Association of University Women. (2000). Tech-savvy: Education girls in the new computer age. AAUW Educational Foundation.

Atwater, M., Baptiste, P., Daniel, L., Hackett, J., Moyer, R., Takemotot, C., & Wilson, N. (1993). MacMillan/McGraw-Hill Science. MacMillan/McGraw-Hill School Publishing Co.

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self‐efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206.

Barman, C. R. (1999). Completing the study: High school students' views of scientists and science. Science and Children36(7), 16-21.

Barman, C. R., Ostlund, K. L., Gatto, C. C., & Halferty, M. (1997). Fifth grade students’ perceptions about scientists and how they study and use science. (ED405220). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=ED405220&id=ED405220

Bergqvist, A., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2017). The influence of textbooks on teachers’ knowledge of chemical bonding representations relative to students’ difficulties understanding. Research in Science & Technological Education35(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1295934

Bozzato, P., Fabris, M. F., & Longobardi, C. (2021). Gender, stereotypes and grade level in the draw-a-scientist test in Italian schoolchildren. International Journal of Science Education, 43(16), 2640-2662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1982062

Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v7.i4.10

Brunner, E., Schwegman, D., & Vincent, J. M. (2021). How much does public school facility funding depend on property wealth? Education Finance and Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00346

Buldu, M. (2006). Young children's perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880500498602

Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students' identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching51(7), 836-869. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21150

Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw‐a‐Scientist Test. Science education67(2), 255-265.

Chionas, G., & Emvalotis, A. (2021). How Peruvian secondary students view scientists and their works: Ready, set, and draw!. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology9(1), 116-137. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1099

Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education62, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016

DiGiuseppe, M. (2014). Representing nature of science in a science textbook: Exploring author–editor–publisher interactions. International Journal of Science Education36(7), 1061-1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.840405

Farland, D. (2003). Modified draw-a-scientist test [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Massachusetts.

Farland‐Smith, D. (2012). Development and field test of the modified draw‐a‐scientist test and the draw‐a‐scientist rubric. School Science and Mathematics112(2), 109-116.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00124.x

Farland-Smith, D. (2017). The evolution of the analysis of the Draw-A-Scientist Test. In P. Katz (Ed.), Drawing for science education. Sense Publishers.

Farland-Smith, D., & Ledger, T. (2016). Understanding how images and attitudes toward scientists and science contribute to science identities: investigating how images drawn by elementary, middle, and high school students reflect their attitudes. In E. A. Railean, G. Walker, A. Elçi & L. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of research on applied learning theory and design in modern education (pp. 498-518). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9634-1.ch024

Ferguson, S. L., & Lezotte, S. M. (2020). Exploring the state of science stereotypes: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the draw‐a‐scientist checklist. School Science and Mathematics120(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12382

Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics102(7), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x

Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw‐A‐Scientist Test. School Science and Mathematics95(4), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x

Finson, K. D., Farland-Smith, D., & Arquette, C. (2017). How scientists are portrayed in NSTA Recommends books. The Hoosier Science Teacher, 41(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.14434/thst.v41i123186

Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children's trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching43(2), 214-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20095

Fujiwara, Y., Velasco, R. C. L., Jones, L. K., & Hite, R. (2021). Competent and cold: A directed content analysis of warmth and competence dimensions to identify and categorize stereotypes of scientists portrayed in meme-based GIFs. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Good, J. J., Woodzicka, J. A., & Wingfield, L. C. (2010). The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance. The Journal of social psychology150(2), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366552

Hillman, S. J., Bloodsworth, K. H., Tilburg, C. E., Zeeman, S. I., & List, H. E. (2014). K-12 Students' perceptions of scientists: Finding a valid measurement and exploring whether exposure to scientists makes an impact. International Journal of Science Education36(15), 2580-2595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.908264

Hudley, C. (2013, May). Education and urban schools. The SES Indicator. https://cutt.ly/9TWbAh4  

Jones, K. L., & Hite, R. (2021). A Global Comparison of the Circumscription and Compromise Theory of Career Development in Science Career Aspirations. School Science and Mathematics, 121(7), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12492

 

Kang, H., Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., D Simpkins, S., Rhee, H. Y., & Turner, C. (2019). How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in science activities and identification with STEM careers. Science Education103(2), 418-439. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21492

Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522-549. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10035

Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International journal of science education33(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645

Kuechle, J. (1995). The last word in biology textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 57(4), 208-210.

Kulm, G., Roseman, J., & Treistman, M. (1999). A benchmarks-based approach to textbook evaluation. Science Books & Films35(4), 147-153.

Lei, R. F., Green, E. R., Leslie, S. J., & Rhodes, M. (2019). Children lose confidence in their potential to “be scientists,” but not in their capacity to “do science”. Developmental science22(6), e12837. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12837

Liang, L., & Cobern, W. W. (2013). Analysis of a typical Chinese high school biology textbook using the AAAS textbook standards. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(4), 329-336. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.942a

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Long, C., Sinclair, B., & Naizer, G. (2018, October 18-20). Evaluating textbook images of scientists, presented at the National Conference for the School Science and Mathematics Association, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education32(5), 669-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385 

Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science, 126, 384-390.

Miele, E. (2014). Using the draw-a-scientist test for inquiry and evaluation. Journal of College Science Teaching43(4), 36-40.

Millward, W. T. (2019, April 26). Predictions of print textbooks’ death remain greatly exaggerated. Edsurge. https://cutt.ly/pTWbFi8  

Monhardt, R. M. (2003). The image of the scientist through the eyes of Navajo children. Journal of American Indian Education, 42(3), 25-39. https://cutt.ly/rTWbJqm

Narayan, R., Park, S., & Peker, D. (2009, January 5-9). Sculpted by culture: Students’ embodied images of scientists [Paper Presentation]. The 3rd International Conference to Review Research on Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, 2009, Mumbai, India.

Narayan, R., Park, S., Peker, D., & Suh, J. (2013). Students’ images of scientists and doing science: An international comparison study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education9(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.923a

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads. The National Academies Press. 

Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Wendt, J., & Lunde, R. (2013). Electronic versus print textbooks: The influence of textbook format on university students’ self-regulated learning strategies, motivation, and text anxiety. American Journal of Distance Education27(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.796230

Schibeci, R. A., & Sorensen, I. (1983). Elementary school children's perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics83(1), 14-20.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage publications.

Simpson, D. Y., Beatty, A. E., & Ballen, C. J. (2021). Teaching between the lines: Representation in science textbooks. Trends in Ecology & Evolution36(1), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.010

Simpson, R., & Sandrin, R. (2021). The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by police during a public health crisis: An experimental test of public perception. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09451-w

Skamp, K., & Logan, M. (2005). Students' interest in science across the middle school years. Teaching Science51(4), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.149229

Skoog, G. (2005). The coverage of human evolution in high school biology textbooks in the 20th century and in current state science standards. Science & Education14(3-5), 395-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5611-z

Steinke, J. (2005). Cultural representations of gender and science: Portrayals of female scientists and engineers in popular films. Science Communication27(1), 27-63. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1075547005278610

Steinke, J., Lapinski, M., Zietsman-Thomas, A., Nwulu, P., Crocker, N., Williams, Y., Higdon, S., & Kuchibhotla, S. (2006). Middle school-aged children's attitudes toward women in science, engineering, and technology and the effects of media literacy training. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering12(4), 295-323. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i4.30

Steinke, J., Lapinski, M. K., Crocker, N., Zietsman-Thomas, A., Williams, Y., Evergreen, S. H., & Kuchibhotla, S. (2007). Assessing media influences on middle school–aged children's perceptions of women in science using the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST). Science Communication29(1), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1075547007306508

Steinke, J., Lapinski, M. K., Long, M., VanDerMass, C., Ryan, L., & Applegate, B. (2009). Seeing oneself as a scientist: media influences and adolescent girls’ science career-possible selves. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15(4), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i4.10

Steinke, J., Long, M., Johnson, M. J., & Ghosh, S. (2008, August 6-9). Gender stereotypes of scientist characters in television programs popular among middle school-aged children [Paper presentation]. Science Communication Interest Group (SCIGroup) for the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Chicago, IL, USA.

Takach, E., & Yacoubian, H. A. (2020). Science Teachers’ and their students’ perceptions of science and scientists. (EJ1240534). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1240534

Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International journal of STEM education5(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5

Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1995). That's funny, you don't look like a teacher!: Interrogating images and identity in popular culture. Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis.

Wood, S., Henning, J. A., Chen, L., McKibben, T., Smith, M. L., Weber, M., Zemenick, A., & Ballen, C. J. (2020). A scientist like me: demographic analysis of biology textbooks reveals both progress and long-term lags. Proceedings of the Royal Society B287(1929), 20200877. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0877

Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & education55(3), 945-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005