Research Article
A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Grade 4 Learning Modules and Lesson Plan on Energy based on the Three-Dimensional Learning Model
Tri Lestari 
,
Iwan Pranoto,
Anita Lie
Article Metrics
Views
39
Downloads
41
Citations
Crossref
0
Lestari T, Pranoto I, Lie A. A qualitative content analysis of the grade 4 learning modules and lesson plan on energy based on the three-dimensional learning model. . 2024;5(1):1-11. doi: 10.12973/ejmse.5.1.1
Lestari, T., Pranoto, I., & Lie, A. (2024). A qualitative content analysis of the grade 4 learning modules and lesson plan on energy based on the three-dimensional learning model. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.5.1.1
Lestari Tri, Iwan Pranoto, and Anita Lie. "A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Grade 4 Learning Modules and Lesson Plan on Energy based on the Three-Dimensional Learning Model ," European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education 5, no. 1 (2024): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.5.1.1
Lestari, T Pranoto, I & Lie, 2024, 'A qualitative content analysis of the grade 4 learning modules and lesson plan on energy based on the three-dimensional learning model', European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-11. Lestari, Tri et al. "A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Grade 4 Learning Modules and Lesson Plan on Energy based on the Three-Dimensional Learning Model." European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2024, pp. 1-11, https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.5.1.1.
Abstract
Online learning platforms and resources created by the Indonesian Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology were a blessing in disguise out of the unprecedented school closure caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. These learning resources are yet to be examined to ensure their usability and their role in improving the quality of learning in science classes. This study analyzed the learning modules and a sample lesson plan from the Teachers Learn Teachers Share platforms based on the three-dimensional learning framework. It examined to what extent is the 3-dimensional learning framework incorporated into the grade 4 learning modules and lesson plan on Energy. The methodology for analyzing the sufficiency of disciplinary crosscutting concepts, scientific practices, and core ideas applied here will enrich the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based education corpus of knowledge. Findings show that the disciplinary core ideas dimension is the most sufficiently covered of all three dimensions while the practices dimension is only partially covered as some of the points are mostly inferred, and the crosscutting concepts dimension still shows much room for improvement. Primary school teachers and schools’ curriculum development units should enrich the learning modules by expanding the discussions on the module coverage with crosscutting concepts.
Keywords: Energy, learning modules, lesson plan, science, three-dimensional learning.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. http://tinyurl.com/4kpjhe7h
Anderson, M. (2011, April 1). The Early and elementary years / the leap into 4th Grade. http://tinyurl.com/2cdskjyp
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (Eds.). (2000). Habits of mind: A developmental series. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Dare to Learn. (2022, July 1). Modul belajar literasi dan numerasi jenjang SD kelas 4 tema 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [Learning modules for literacy and numeracy for elementary school grade 4th theme 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]. https://tinyurl.com/y4p2hcuh
Gozali, I., Lie, A., & Tamah, S. M. (2023). Examining Language Teachers’ Change in TPACK-HOTS Self-Perception during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 24(1), 280-304.
Houseal, A. (2015). A visual representation of three-dimensional learning: A tool for evaluating curriculum. Science Scope, 3(1), 58-62. https://bit.ly/4ckV962
Hudson, P., English, L., Dawes, L., King, D., & Baker, S. (2015). Exploring links between pedagogical knowledge practices and student outcomes in STEM education for primary schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 134-151. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n6.8
Kaldaras, L., Akaeze, H., & Krajcik, J. (2021). Developing and validating Next Generation Science Standards-aligned learning progression to track three-dimensional learning of electrical interactions in high school physical science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 589-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21672
Lie, A., Tamah, S. M., & Gozali, I. (2023). Appropriating TPACK in preparation for hybrid learning: Innovations in teaching practices. MexTESOL Journal, 47(3), Article 46445. https://bit.ly/4c8xYM4
Lie, A., Tamah, S. M., Gozali, I., Triwidayati, K. R., Utami, T. S. D., & Jemadi, F. (2020). Secondary School Language Teachers’ Online Learning Engagement During The COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 803-832. https://doi.org/10.28945/4626
Miles, S., Barret, E., Barton, L., Furlong, J., Galvin, C., & Whitty, G. (1993). Initial teacher education in England and Wales a topography. Research Papers in Education, 8(3), 275-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152930080302
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2021). Ayo guru berbagi [Teacher shares]. http://tinyurl.com/5ycxs3vb
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. In H. R. Quinn (Ed.), A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: for States, by States. National Academics Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023, December 5). PISA 2022 Results: Factsheets Indonesia. https://bit.ly/48R9dkF
Pritchett, L., & Beatty, A. (2015). Slow down, you’re going too fast: Matching curricula to student skill levels. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 276-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.013
Radloff, J. D. (2015). Give the Students Science: Creation and Implementation of a Fourth Grade STEM Unit. Purdue Journal of Service-Learning and International Engagement, 2(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284315695
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Psikologi pendidikan: Teori dan praktik [Educational psychology: Theory and practice] (9th ed.). Indeks.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
