The Application of AI in Chemistry Learning: Experiences of Secondary School Students in Zimbabwe
This study investigated the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools into secondary school chemistry education in Zimbabwe, assessing their i.
- Pub. date: March 15, 2025
- Online Pub. date: March 12, 2025
- Pages: 1-15
- 52 Downloads
- 187 Views
- 0 Citations
- #Artificial Intelligence
- # chemistry education
- # curriculum integration
- # educational technology
- # student engagement.
Abstract:
This study investigated the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools into secondary school chemistry education in Zimbabwe, assessing their impact on student engagement and academic performance. Grounded in Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory and Cognitive Load Theory, the research employed a mixed-methods approach within a pragmatic framework. Quantitative data were collected through pre-test and post-test assessments and structured surveys, comparing an experimental group using AI tools with a control group employing traditional methods. Qualitative data from student and teacher interviews and classroom observations were analysed thematically. ANCOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in post-test scores between the experimental and control groups, F (1, 117) = 188.86, p < .005, η² = 0.617, demonstrating a large effect size of AI integration on academic performance. Students in the experimental group exhibited a mean improvement of 20%, controlling for pre-test differences. Additionally, interaction effects between AI use and gender (F (1,115) = 0.17, p = .684) as well as prior chemistry knowledge (F (1,115) = 0.05, p = .829) were not statistically significant. Furthermore, 85% of the experimental group reported higher engagement levels, confirming AI’s role in fostering motivation and conceptual understanding. AI tools facilitated personalized learning paths, interactive simulations, and real-time feedback, optimizing cognitive efficiency and deep learning. Despite these advantages, significant challenges emerged, including limited internet access, insufficient technological resources, lack of teacher training, and curriculum integration difficulties. These barriers highlight the need for strategic investments in digital infrastructure, professional development for educators, and curriculum revisions to fully integrate AI into chemistry education. The findings underscore AI’s transformative potential in STEM education within developing nations. Addressing infrastructural and pedagogical challenges is critical to maximizing AI's impact, ensuring equitable access, and fostering long-term sustainability in educational innovation.
artificial intelligence chemistry education curriculum integration educational technology student engagement
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, chemistry education, curriculum integration, educational technology, student engagement.
0
References
Afzal, A., Khan, S., Daud, S., Ahmad, Z., & Butt, A. (2023). Addressing the digital divide: Access and use of technology in education. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 883-895. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.326
Ali, O., Murray, P. A., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Malik, T. (2024). The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, Article 123076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076
Boateng, G. (2024). Leveraging AI to advance science and computing education across Africa: Challenges, progress, and opportunities. In P. Ilic, I. Casebourne, & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: The intersection of technology and pedagogy (pp. 205-222). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71232-6_10
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing service. AI Magazine, 25(3), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v25i3.1774
Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005
Choi, J. H., Garrod, O., Atherton, P., Joyce-Gibbons, A., Mason-Sesay, M., & Björkegren, D. (2023). Are LLMs useful in the poorest schools? The Teacher. AI in Sierra Leone. Arxiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02982
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579
dos Santos, R. P. (2023a). Enhancing chemistry learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as agents to think with: A comparative case study. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4447416
dos Santos, R. P. (2023b). Enhancing chemistry learning with ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, and Claude as agents-to-think-with: A comparative case study. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4629567
Falebita, O. S., & Kok, P. J. (2024). Strategic goals for artificial intelligence integration among STEM academics and undergraduates in African higher education: A systematic review. Discover Education, 3, Article 151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00252-1
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fox, S., & Rey, V. F. (2024). A cognitive load theory (CLT) analysis of machine learning explainability, transparency, interpretability, and shared interpretability. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 6(3), 1494-1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/make6030071
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hakkarainen, K., & Bredikyte, M. (2008). The zone of proximal development in play and learning. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4(4), 2-11. https://bit.ly/4kmhnsg
Harland, T. (2003). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and problem-based learning: Linking a theoretical concept with practice through action research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052483
Heeg, D. M., & Avraamidou, L. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence in school science: A systematic literature review. Educational Media International, 60(2), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2023.2264990
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://bit.ly/41owSqV
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 621-653). Globethics Publications. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
Kirk, R. E. (2013). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kodkin, V. L., & Artem’eva, E. V. (2024). ChatGPT: Application in chemistry education and challenges. Journal of Computer and Communications, 12(3), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2024.123012
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Metu, S. I., Okore, G. J., Nwaodu, M.-C., & Nwosu, C. C. (2024). Barriers to incorporating artificial intelligence in chemistry instruction in post-primary education in Orlu Education Zone II, Imo State. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Computing and Applications, 2(1), 94-99. https://bit.ly/41lnu7o
Nugraheni, A. R. E., & Srisawasdi, N. (2025). Development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ knowledge of technological integration in inquiry-based learning to promote chemistry core competencies. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RP00160E
Okolo, C. T., Aruleba, K., & Obaido, G. (2023). Responsible AI in Africa—Challenges and opportunities. In D. O. Eke, K. Wakunuma, & S. Akintoye (Eds.), Responsible AI in Africa (pp. 35-64). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3_3
Oladele, J. I., Ayanwale, M. A., & Ndlovu, M. (2023). Technology adoption for STEM education in higher education: Students' experience from selected Sub-Saharan African countries. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 31(1), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.31.1.15
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Pane, J. F., Griffin, B. A., McCaffrey, D. F., & Karam, R. (2014). Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713507480
Panjeh, S., Nordahl-Hansen, A., & Cogo-Moreira, H. (2023). Moving Forward to a World Beyond 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 Effects Sizes: New Cutoffs for School-Based Anti-Bullying Interventions. Journal of interpersonal violence, 38(11-12), 7843-7851. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221147065
Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Education Technology Research and Development, 68, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Walsh, C., Mital, A., Ratcliff, M., Yap, A., & Jamaleddine, Z. (2020). A public-private partnership to transform online education through high levels of academic student support. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6107
Wang’ang’a, A. W. (2024). Consequences of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education in Kenya: Literature review. East African Journal of Education Studies, 7(1), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.7.1.1718
White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-experimental design and methods. UNICEF Office of Research. https://bit.ly/3FcwtQO
Yu, H. (2024). The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers' roles. Heliyon, 10(2), Article e24289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7