Fostering Mathematical Creativity in Primary Education: Impact of an Educational Program on Teachers’ Classroom Practices
Research consistently highlights the importance of promoting creativity in curricula worldwide and within school settings. However, teachers often fai.
- Pub. date: June 15, 2025
- Online Pub. date: May 05, 2025
- Pages: 97-112
- 13 Downloads
- 44 Views
- 0 Citations
- #Classroom observation
- # creativity-provoking tasks
- # intervention
- # mathematical creativity
- # teachers’ practices.
Abstract:
Research consistently highlights the importance of promoting creativity in curricula worldwide and within school settings. However, teachers often fail to recognize mathematical creativity (mainly described and evaluated through fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration) and are usually ill-prepared to enhance it in their students. Few studies have incorporated educational programs focused on mathematical creativity, showing positive results in enriching participants' knowledge and perception of creativity. Nevertheless, participants' teaching practices were not observed, leading to uncertainty about whether these participants could integrate opportunities for students’ development of mathematical creativity in their lessons. In this qualitative study, we attempt to bridge this gap by observing teachers' practices before and after an intervention focused on mathematical creativity. Seven in-service primary school Greek teachers participated in the study. Their teaching practices were examined through classroom observation, using an observation protocol, before and after their voluntary participation in an educational program aimed at enriching their knowledge of mathematical creativity and their ability to cultivate it in the classroom. Observational data were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results showed that prior to the intervention, participants sparsely employed creativity-fostering approaches in their teaching. However, after the intervention, they significantly increased the time spent on creativity-provoking tasks, utilizing various creativity-promoting approaches and primarily focusing on developing fluency, flexibility, and generating new knowledge. Nevertheless, they did not significantly develop their skills in originality and elaboration, indicating the need for further support in cultivating these aspects of creativity. Future implications for professional teacher training and mathematics textbook writing are discussed.
classroom observation creativity provoking tasks intervention mathematical creativity teachers practices
Keywords: Classroom observation, creativity-provoking tasks, intervention, mathematical creativity, teachers’ practices.
0
References
Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer‐Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x
Alsahou, H. (2015). Teachers' beliefs about creativity and practices for fostering creativity in science classrooms in the state of Kuwait [Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter]. University of Exeter Repository. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/19224
Bicer, A., Bicer, A., Perihan, C., & Lee, Y. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ preparations for designing and implementing creativity-directed mathematical tasks and instructional practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34, 491-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00409-x
Bolden, D. S., Harries, T. V., & Newton, D. P. (2010). Pre-service primary teachers’ conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9207-z
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brinkmann, A., & Sriraman, B. (2009). Aesthetics and creativity: An exploration of the relationships between the constructs. In B. Sriraman, & S. Goodchild (Eds.), Relatively and philosophically earnest: Festschrift in honor of Paul Ernest’s 65th birthday (pp. 57-80). Information Age Publishing.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Desli, D., & Zioga, M. (2015). Looking for creativity in primary school mathematical tasks. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 989-995). Charles University in Prague. https://hal.science/hal-01287299
Ervynck, G. (2002). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42-53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_3
Gralewski, J. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and possibilities for its development in Polish high schools: A qualitative study. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 3(2), 292-329. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0019
Guilford, J. P. (1966). Measurement and creativity. Theory into Practice, 5(4), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405846609542023
Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00367914
Hershkovitz, S., Peled, I., & Littler, G. (2009). Mathematical creativity and giftedness in elementary school: Task and teacher promoting creativity for all. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Εds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 253-269). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909352_017
Jao, L. (2017). Shifting pre-service teachers’ beliefs about mathematics teaching: The contextual situation of a mathematics methods course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 895-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9719-9
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299613
Juter, K., & Sriraman, B. (2011). Does high achieving in mathematics= gifted and/or creative in mathematics? In B. Sriraman, & K. H. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 45-65). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-439-3_4
Klavir, R., & Hershkovitz, S. (2008). Teaching and evaluating ‘open-ended’ problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 20. http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/klavir.pdf
Klein, S., & Leikin, R. (2020). Opening mathematical problems for posing open mathematical tasks: what do teachers do and feel? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09983-y
Kozlowski, J. S., & Si, S. (2019). Mathematical creativity: A vehicle to foster equity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, Article 100579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100579
Kwon, O. N., Park, J. H., & Park, J. S. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03036784
Leikin, R., & Elgrably, H. (2020). Problem posing through investigations for the development and evaluation of proof-related skills and creativity skills of prospective high school mathematics teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.002
Leikin, R., & Elgrably, H. (2022). Strategy creativity and outcome creativity when solving open tasks: Focusing on problem posing through investigations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 54, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01319-1
Levenson, E. (2015). Exploring Ava’s developing sense for tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9262-3
Lev-Zamir, H., & Leikin, R. (2011). Creative mathematics teaching in the eye of the beholder: Focusing on teachers' conceptions. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.550715
Lev-Zamir, H., & Leikin, R. (2013). Saying versus doing: Teachers’ conceptions of creativity in elementary mathematics teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0464-4
Meyer, A. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2013). Inventing creativity: An exploration of the pedagogy of ingenuity in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 113(8), 400-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12039
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://bit.ly/42xZYps
Panaoura, A., & Panaoura, G. (2014). Teachers' awareness of creativity in mathematical teaching and their practice. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 4, 1-11.
Pehkonen, E. (1999). Open-ended problems: A method for an educational change. In M. Hejny, & J. Novotna (Eds.), Proceedings of International Symposium on Elementary Maths Teaching (pp. 56-62). Turku University.
Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2017). What have we learned about giftedness and creativity? An overview of a five years journey. In R. Leikin, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness (pp. 201-223). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_13
Plucker, J., & Zabelina, D. (2009). Creativity and interdisciplinarity: One creativity or many creativities? ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0155-3
Sánchez, A., Font, V., & Breda, A. (2022). Significance of creativity and its development in mathematics classes for preservice teachers who are not trained to develop students’ creativity. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34, 863-885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00367-w
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x033002012
Shriki, A. (2010). Working like real mathematicians: Developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9212-2
Shriki, A. (2020). The many faces of creativity. In D. Patkin, A. Shriki, & I. Levenberg (Eds.), The multifaceted nature of creativity in the teaching of geometry (pp. 3-29). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811218750_0001
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 29, 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
Sriraman, B. (2009). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0114-z
Sriraman, B., Freiman, V., & Lirette-Pitre, N. (Eds.). (2009). Interdisciplinarity, creativity, and learning: Mathematics with literature, paradoxes, history, technology, and modeling. Information Age Publishing. https://www.infoagepub.com/products/interdisciplinarity-creativity-and-learning
Sriraman, B., Yaftian, N., & Lee, K. H. (2011). Mathematical creativity and mathematics education: A derivative of existing research. In B. Sriraman & K. H. Lee (Εds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 119-130). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-439-3_8
Torrance, E. P. (1965). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. Daedalus, 94(3), 663-681. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20026936
Yeo, K. K. J. (2009). Secondary 2 students' difficulties in solving non-routine problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 10, 1-30. https://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/yeo.pdf
Zioga, M., & Desli, D. (2019). Improving mathematical creativity in the classroom: A case study of a fourth-grade teacher. In M. Nolte (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness (pp. 242-248). WTM. https://d-nb.info/1193877903/34#page=245
Zioga, M., & Desli, D. (2023). Fostering mathematical creativity through problem posing: The use of “What-if…” strategy. In I. Papadopoulos & N. Patsiala (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference on Problem Solving in Mathematics Education - ProMath 2022 (pp. 149–163). Faculty of Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. http://promath.org/docs/ProMath22_Proceedings.pdf
Zioga, M., & Desli, D. (2025). In-service teachers’ seeing mathematical creativity: Unravelling and launching mathematical creativity tasks. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Zioga, M., & Desli, D. (in press). Δραστηριότητες ανοιχτής απάντησης και καλλιέργεια της δημιουργικότητας στα μαθηματικά: Οι επιλογές των εκπαιδευτικών [Open-ended tasks and the development of mathematical creativity: Teachers’ choices]. In Πρακτικά 10ου Πανελλήνιου Συνεδρίου της Εν.Ε.Δι.Μ. [Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Greek Association for Research in Mathematics Education (G.A.R.M.E.)]. G.A.R.M.E.